Showing posts with label Capitalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Capitalism. Show all posts

Saturday, September 11, 2021

State Secrets ~~ Pat Garofalo

https://boondoggle.substack.com/p/state-secrets

Secret stamp
Photo credit: RestrictedData

This is Boondoggle, the newsletter about corporations ripping off our states and cities. If you’re not currently a subscriber, please click the green button below to sign up. Thanks!

The Fort Wayne, Indiana, city council is going to vote on a 10-year property tax break for a new warehouse, which will be worth $16 million to the beneficiary. There’s an issue, though, beyond the potential loss of public money.

The city council doesn’t know who that beneficiary is.

It sounds ridiculous, but it’s true. "I'm sure it's probably something that's going to be very exciting. They say up to a thousand jobs, you know, all these things coming. The taxpayers and the citizens, though, will be on us to make sure we specifically know what we're voting for," said one council member.

The city council doesn’t know which corporation it might be subsidizing because the few officials who have been let in on the secret — including the mayor — have signed non-disclosure agreements preventing them from divulging the corporation’s identity. Rumor has it that the warehouse will belong to Amazon, but no one will confirm it.

This is a great example of the pernicious use of non-disclosure agreements in economic development deals and how it corrupts local democracy.

Share

There’s no national data on how prevalent these agreements are, but once you start looking, examples pop up everywhere. I’ve covered one here: The city council of Gallatin, Tennessee, approved nearly $20 million in tax breaks for “Project Woolhawk,” which turned out to be Facebook. Council members claimed they didn’t know Facebook was the beneficiary until after they voted. These agreements have been employed in New YorkMinnesotaOhio, and Maryland, too. Amazon, in particular, seems to make them a part of its standard operating procedure everywhere it goes.

And they cover more than just local economic development office officials or city council members and mayors. Amazon forced non-disclosure agreement for its HQ2 search onto university researchers, urban planners, the waitstaff at a restaurant where the local chamber of commerce met to discuss their city’s bid, and a hotel concierge.

These agreements generally prevent officials from discussing anything about the state of negotiations between the government and the corporation, other than vague details about the type of project and maybe the overall cost, and most of the time they only allow officials to publicly release information once the deal is done and confirmed.

Why do corporations insist on all this secrecy? To prevent pushback from the public.

Share Boondoggle

In correspondence with a local official in San Jose, Google confirmed that the goal of the agreements was to prevent public relations problems in the community that might arise once word got out that Google would benefit from subsidies. A random tech project with a silly name isn’t as outrage inducing as Facebook, specifically, so corporations would prefer the former be the subject of debate.

Corporations push these agreements so often, in fact, that local officials just accept them as a matter of course. “It’s customary now, when mega-Fortune 500 companies come, that they prefer that you not divulge what they’re doing,” said the manager of the Village of University Park, an Illinois community that gave subsidies to Amazon. “It happens all the time.”

Even the Fort Wayne council members aren’t questioning the existence of the non-disclosure agreements, just that they weren’t also pulled into the loop and asked to sign one in exchange for receiving information before any vote occurs. “I'm happy to sign a non-disclosure, but either way, I don't want to be put in a position where I'm asked to make a decision without knowing what I'm deciding," said one council member.

But these agreements are an outrageous assault on the public’s right to know what’s being done in their name. Nobody is asking for these corporations or officials to divulge trade secrets or sensitive personal info on their employees; this is literally about whether and how public resources will be distributed, and what sort of negotiating stance public officials take when faced with a powerful corporation asking for money and other favors.

Leave a comment

The use of these agreements is ultimately about power: Corporations want the power to extract concessions from elected officials without the countervailing power of public scrutiny being applied.

Fortunately, there is a very simple solution to this problem: States and cities can just ban non-disclosure agreements in economic development deals (and more widely, too, of course). Illinois Rep. Michael Halpin has a bill to do so in his state, and New York Sen. Michael Gianaris had one to do the same after the Amazon HQ2 debacle. Several New York City council members have proposed one there too.

Elected leaders can simply cut this strategy off at the knees with legislation that is just a couple of pages long. If any enterprising Indiana lawmakers who happen to read this newsletter want to introduce a bill, that’d be great. I’ll even email you the language if you want.

It’s impossible for citizens to effectively engage with their government if that government won’t even disclose the names of the entities with which it is doing business. Concerned voters are left fighting ghosts and vagueries instead of real institutions and specific policy choices.

Corporate leaders, of course, like it that way, but there’s no reason the rest of us have to put up with it. Call or email your state and local officials and tell them to ban these things today.

Share


ONE MORE THING: Dr. Emily Erickson at Alabama A&M University put together a really fantastic report on how corporate tax giveaways have failed one Alabama community. She surveyed workers in Anniston, Alabama, and found them toiling away in dangerous jobs for bad pay, while “Anniston’s public services — parks, playgrounds, libraries, public safety, schools, and others — are underfunded in part because of the public subsidies (some call it “corporate welfare” or “corporate giveaways”) given to these large multinational corporations to entice them to locate in Anniston.”

Seriously, give it a read. It’s a great distillation of why the sort of stuff covered in this newsletter matters to real communities.

Reading gif

Thanks for reading this edition of Boondoggle. If you liked it, please take a moment to click the little heart under the headline or below. And forward it around to friends, family, or neighbors using the green buttons. Every click and share really helps.

Share

If you don’t subscribe already and you’d like to sign up, just click below.

Wednesday, September 8, 2021

The Social Disorder And The Internet. ~~ MrRedwoodGuy

~~ Written by MrRedwoodGuy ~~


The Social Disorder And The Internet.

September 6, 2021

The first serious critique of technology that I encountered was the “Unabomber Manifesto” by Ted Kaczynski. As the world understood the writer to be a crazed criminal, I didn’t have many opportunities to openly discuss the manifesto with any of the middle class people of my circle. It was my first introduction to the question, “Is all progress good?” Even today, it’s hard to find any part of the general public critical of technology, and what is always called progress

 As an early adopter of PCs, and the Internet (I actually had Prodigy, then CompuServe, then AOL) I succumbed to the popular theme that the Internet would democratize the world - a force for good. But, almost immediately, I had nagging doubts as I noticed that avatars were far more cruel and crude in social behavior than real people behind them would be when face-to-face.. Chat rooms and fora became cesspools of foul, unforgiving crudity in the blink of an eye when one avatar detected a slight or an insult from another. In spite of this devolution of human interaction, we all invested ever more time behind keyboards, and most of it was counter-productive, and even infantile behavior. As the ‘90s rolled on, the tone and topic on the Internet became ever more political, as forces from other media, like radio, TV, and print, found ways to integrate the new technology medium into their brand, by adding web sites and commenting schemes. Soon enough, every public issue in education, medicine, or science turned into a political identity issue as a stand-in for the Good v. Evil. Politics quickly lost all nuance in this reductionism for popular consumption. Surveillance of the population was an immediate by-product of the requirement for an ISP account and an email address to make use of the Internet. Not a single click or keystroke - anywhere on the World Wide Web was anonymous. The web browsers (actually the entire HTTP protocol) was designed to track identity. Built-in cookie management was soon supplanted by ever more sophisticated surveillance bots. Visiting a web site meant your browser was fair game for dozens of tracking agents to be loaded onto your machine invisibly. Overnight, the users became the commodity being bundled, sorted, monitored, and sold repeatedly into the hands of not just advertisers, but the NSA who was invited to the party by the biggest of the tech companies - Google. “Searching for terrorists” was more than enough justification for everyone to turn their head the other way. 

Behavioral manipulation and modification was the next development when Social Media was born. Artificial Intelligence research led to the innovation of behavioral algorithms. Decision-making code that sits atop Facebook, and YouTube, and Google, Twitter, and the rest, and could manage and manipulate the preferences of billions of users in real time as they scrolled their accounts. The surveillance provided your history, and from your history your quirks, preferences, predilections and biases could be managed to fuel your interests and beliefs. If you watched a video on 9/11 conspiracy news in the past, you were fed a steady recommendation diet of 9/11 conspiracy videos.  No matter how narrow, how specific, or how bizarre your tastes were, the algos could always find more of the same for you to consume. Your eyes on ads was the crucial goal.  They needed to keep you coming back, staying longer, engaging with more content. To that end a proper reward system was needed for the user. The first one developed was the LIKE button, and a careful system of doling out the LIKES, in just the right increments as rewards. The job of the algos is to keep your eyes on the site, viewing as many ads as is humanly possible day and night. That’s how social media companies - defactot ad agencies -  increase revenue. 

But, in that process of keeping you engaged in the site, they are also keeping you engaged in your interests. If that interest is monster movies, there may not be much harm to society. But, what happens if your interest is quack cures for cancer, or promoting conspiracy theories? A second phenomenon then unfolds - - the algos help you find others with the same interests. You bundle yourself into groups that can grow into tens of thousands of members. In pre-Internet history, you might have fed your interest by purchasing the National Inquirer at the grocery store and reading those fictitious stories. You’d be alone in your pursuit, and your faulty thinking. You would find it hard to be validated in your belief that Democrats were operating a global pedophile ring and sacrificing babies on alters. 

Internet algos, operating on billions of users in real time, quickly lever-up the popularity of quacks, conspiracy theories, and deliberate misinformation (e.g. going viral). Algos are the ultimate ‘confirmation bias’ tool. Validation by the multitudes of ‘followers’ feels good to egos not accustomed to validation.. A YouTube Doctor with 500,000 subscribers is assumed to be a credible expert  just on the basis that half a million other people think so. Does your personal physician have 500,000 fans listening to her every word? The New England Journal of Medicine has about 1M monthly readers - a number swamped by the most popular YouTube doctor with 8M subscribers. This is not to say they are all quacks - they aren’t - but that quacks abound, and seek cover,  in their ranks. 

The mass production, marketing and consumption of junk thinking, quackery, and bad science is completely analogous to the American consumption of junk food. If it tastes good, it is good, and everyone has the right to produce it - and consume it. The social media algos that direct the behavior of their billions of users, is the equivalent of the industrial food industry’s copious amounts of added sugar, salt and fat into junk food to make it more delicious to our taste buds. And, just as obesity and metabolic diseases are destroying the health of the body, the operation of these algos is destroying the ability to think rationally. Just as eating a bag of Doritos is satisfying, so too is it equally satisfying to hear others reciting your fantasy about fascists getting ready to round up the population for FEMA Death Camps. 

The sum of all this technology is that it is destroying trust among the citizenry as fast as fires are destroying the forests in the West. Trust in our important institutions, trust in each other, trust in any commonly held beliefs that the society needs to remain cohesive and functioning. The FDA, the CDC, the NIH were never perfect, but they did provide useful guardrails for public safety. The alternative of simple “caveat emptor” everywhere would be typical of a 3W nation - which is now, exactly where we are headed. When all trust is gone, when every conspiracy theory  is as valid as any factual history, or scientific theory, then only chaos remains for the society. Successful social orders are not about truths - truth is too elusive to claim by anyone. But, social orders need a level of common trust, and some common beliefs among its members, in order to function to the benefit of the whole. No one should assume that every technology must be deployed just because some businessman says so. No one should accept technologies as beneficial or unavoidable without careful consideration of all the intended and unintended consequences. Just ask homeowners in previously nice neighborhoods that got converted to ‘AirBNB resort destinations’  without review, without question, without approval, without warning to current residents. Don’t like having 20 rowdy drunks partying every weekend in the house next door? Hey, it’s a free country

Friday, August 20, 2021

No Solutions Under Capitalism: Revolution is Required ~~ PAUL STREET

https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/08/20/no-solutions-under-capitalism-revolution-is-required/

~~ and podcast link 

https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/08/06/paul-street-2/

~~ posted for collectivist ~~

Liberals and progressives would do well to understand that while class is not everything – far from it, as I shall argue below – there are still no real or lasting solutions to problems that rightly agitate them under capitalism and bourgeois democracy, that is, under the de facto material dictatorship of the capitalist class and its mode of production. Take the giant American problem of racial inequality and oppression. Does it have a certain real life of its own, one that should not simply be reduced to class in economistic ways? Sure. Of course. Go to any major US city and observe how residence and employment and the lack of both are apportioned and spaced by race. Look at the long and continuing legacies of Black chattel slavery and its ugly stepchild Jim Crow: the de facto racial apartheid, separate and unequal settlement, schooling, and investment patterns that are endemic across the United States along with racially disparate mass incarceration and felony marking and numerous other and interrelated practices and policies wired to produce savagely disparate outcomes by race. Look at the dogged denial of race and systemic white racism’s continuing central relevance in American life on the part of millions of right-wing white Amerikaners, whose politics are shaped at their core by absurd narratives of white victimization and a fear of white demographic encirclement. Race has a terrible space and life of its own in the US. Race matters. It matters a lot.

Still, it is impossible to properly understand race and racism’s evolution in the U.S. (and elsewhere) without grasping how it developed in accord with the economic and political imperatives of capital and class rule. Racial othering, the dehumanizing consignment of Black (along with Native American) people to the realm of Nature, beyond the sphere of human Society and the social contract, permitted the southern US ruling class and the broader American capitalist system to profit and expand on the basis of the ruthless class-race exploitation and torture of Black labor – as chattel slaves, sharecroppers, debt peons, prison laborers, and poorly paid wage-earners. It also fueled working class divisions that undermine the popular solidarity required for mass opposition to the American capitalist class. The great Black scholar W.E.B. DuBois wrote brilliantly about what he called “the psychological wage” of whiteness, whereby ordinary white working people cling to the notion that their skin color confers special power and privileges that compensate for their subordination (wage-enslavement) to capital.

At the same time, it is inconceivable that the nation’s savage inequalities of race, intimately related to and overlapping with its ferocious disparities of class, will ever be properly addressed, much less overcome, under capitalism. The bourgeois system, caught up in a continuous global intra-capitalist struggle for markets, materials, labor supplies, and share of the surplus value and profit pie, does not have a socially responsible surplus at hand to even begin to remotely redress the massive racial disparity created by the genocidal oppression and wealth extraction imposed on Black people since even before the nation was founded. At the same time, the ruling class remains deeply invested in racial divide-and-rule. Like economic/class inequality, racial inequality and oppression will never be overcome under the capitalist mode of production, something that is most particularly evident and true in a deeply racist nation whose original and pivotal accumulation of capital was achieved through Black chattel slavery.

Much the same can be said about gender disparity and oppression. Any remotely and unbiased observer can and should know that gender oppression predates the capitalist system and possesses a perverse, many-sided logic and life of its own under capitalism. Like toxic whiteness and intimately related to it, toxic maleness and opposition to women’s rights is a major force in right-wing neofascist politics. It is also a major factor in daily American life, with girls and women regularly subjected to horrific abuse ranging from verbal harassment and shaming to beatings, rape, and murder. Being female is a major barrier to advancement and equality across the class structure, from animal processing plants in Iowa to CEO appointments and presidential viability atop the corporate sector and the national government. Gender oppression, hardly invented by capitalism, has a life of its own to this day.

Still, it is impossible to understand patriarchy’s modern forms and essence without reference to capitalism. The noxious and dehumanizing Western consignment of women to the realm of Nature, outside Society and the social contract, provided justification for the consignment of women to the unpaid toil of raising, providing care for, and otherwise sustaining proletarian populations (the natural resource called human labor power) – and for the bidding down of wages to women in the paid workforce. At the same time, the notion of “the women problem” being meaningfully solved under capitalist rule is fantastic. The bourgeois system will not provide and does not possess the resources required to seriously redress and overcome gender oppression. It remains dependent on the cheap and free, wage-suppressing and profits-protecting labor of women both in the paid workplace and in unpaid homes. Patriarchal capitalism provides middle- and working-class males with a “psychological wage” of maleness that offers them a measure of mental and status compensation for their subordination to an emasculating US One Percent that owns more wealth than the nation’s bottom 95 percent. And gender conflict divisions join with racial and ethnic fragmentation in fueling popular social and political divisions that the capitalist class can’t help but love.

Like racial oppression, gender oppression will not be overcome under the capitalist mode of production.

Or take the immigration question. Capitalism hardly invented conflict between “settled” populations and geographically incoming masses from other territories, races, and/or cultures. Obviously overlapping with and intimately related to whiteness and racial division, the immigration issue has a certain perverse logic and political life of its own, linking and overlapping with race and gender divisions to fuel border-obsessed right-wing nationalist neofascistic politics in the U.S. as in Europe and elsewhere. Still, the modern-day immigration issue is intimately bound up with capitalism in multiple and obvious ways, including shifting patterns of global investment, technical displacement, rural enclosure, and environmental ruin. The profits system clearly cannot and will not begin to seriously address and redress the misery it inflicts on migrants. At the same time, capital derives profits from the exploitation of Otherized migrant labor power whose price is pushed down by migrants’ stateless/rightless status. And capital garners political divide-and-rule protection from the direction of “settled” volk working and middle-class rage away from concentrated wealth and power (capital and its political class) and against Otherized immigrant scapegoats. There’s a “psychological wage” of native status that provides a measure of mental and status compensation for untold millions of “native” US- Americans suffering under the yoke of capitalist rule: “Hey, I’m an American, unlike those people, who don’t know our ways or speak our language.’

The immigration problem will not be solved under the capitalist of production.

Most good progressives say they are against war and imperialism. Neither of those terrible problems were invented by capitalism. Read Gibbon and Thucydides. Google up Genghis Kan. Study the Greek, Roman, Aztec, Inca, Holy Roman, and Chinese among other great empires of the long precapitalist past. At the same time, war and empire, the subsidy and advancement of which massively cancel social and environmental protection and uplift within and beyond the US today, are not without lives of their own. “War,” as Chris Hedges ironically titled his first book, “is a force that gives us meaning.”  Hedges drew brilliantly on classical literature and his experiences as a war correspondent to show that war seduces whole nations, generating illusory narratives that much of their publics internalize and use to support lethal conflicts. He also related how many who experience war find it invigorating and even addictive.

Soldiers have long killed millions and died en masse to defend empires, typically justified with absurd notions of national greatness and exceptionalism. Ruling classes in great powers benefit from what might be called “the psychological wage of Empire” – the sense among their subordinate domestic classes that they are people of elevated status and power because they reside in and fight for a “great” nation with awesome strength on the global stage. There have also long been material wages of Empire for homeland rulers to distribute to restive domestic masses: materials, goods, and even slaves extracted from conquered colonies, regions, and nations have provided imperial rulers economic benefits with which to pacify their subject populations at home. This all predates capitalism.

Still, the reigning Western and global imperialism of the last half millennium has been fundamentally capitalist and the capitalism that has ruled the world during that time is imperialist by origin, nature and definition and in its own specific ways. Marxists from Lenin on have noted how the rich capitalist nations’ plundering of the oppressed periphery of the world capitalist system periphery permit rich state capitalist states to buy off and even “bourgeoisify” certain better off sections (what Lenin called “the labor aristocracy”) of their domestic proletariats. “To a certain degree the workers of the oppressor nations are partners of their own bourgeoisie in plundering the workers (and the mass of the population) of the oppressed nations; politically … compared with the workers of the oppressed nations, they occupy a privileged position in many spheres of political life; ideologically … they are taught, at school and in life, disdain and contempt for the workers of the oppressed nations,” Lenin wrote.

Raj Patel and Jason Moore go back to the system’s imperial origins in the “long Sixteenth Century” in their important book A History of the World in seven Cheap Things: A Guide to Capitalism, Nature, and he Future of the Planet. “Capitalism,” Patel and Moore write, “not only has frontiers; it exists only through frontiers, expanding from one place to the next, transforming sociecological relations, producing more and more kinds of goods and services that circulate through an expanding series of exchanges.” Capitalism, as Moore showed in his pathbreaking book Capitalism in the Web of Life, depends on such expansion in order to replenish its ever-self-endangered rate of profit (a product of the competitive capitalist race to reduce costs through new applications of technology/constant capital) through the search for and appropriation of new supplies of “cheap nature”: cheap raw materials, cheap labor power, and cheap energy.

The expansion has always required brutal military force and conquest, empire. It is intimately tied to racial oppression and Othering, to the naturalizing dehumanization of nonwhite people on the wrong side of imperial capitalism’s rapacious frontiers. It also by definition Ecocidal, dependent on endless, profit rate-sustaining expansion and the environmentally brutal commodification of “everything under the sun.” The task of advancing and protecting of the American Empire (the leading military agent and protector of not just of American capitalism but of global capitalism after World War II) gave rise of the Pentagon System and the military-industrial-complex, a massive corporate subsidy and diversion of public resources from the potential meeting of social and environmental needs to the high-tech corporate sector. American capital is deeply addicted to “cost-plus” “defense” (empire) contracts and the warfare state, which provides an immensely profitable outlet for surplus capital investment and sustains a military empire that possesses the single largest institutional carbon footprint on Earth.

We will not overcome war, empire, and, for that matter, Ecocide under the capitalist mode of production.

Liberals and progressives are concerned about political authoritarianism. They should be, God knows. The menace posed by repressive political tyranny is very real in the US, where one of the two reigning capitalist political organization (the Amerikaner Party of Trump, APoT, formerly known as the Republican Party), has gone full-on white-nationalist and authoritarian – fascist, in all honesty. The “Nazified” APoT appears to be well on the way to achieving full control of the national US government in 2025. Unless blocked by a popular rebellion the dollar-drenched Democrats will never encourage, this neofascist restoration and consolidation will come with and through big help from the many “red states” currently under literally sickening APoT control and no small collateral assistance from the hollow resistance of the dismal Democrats. It will develop with no small ironic assistance from America’s minority-rule-friendly slaveowners’ Constitution, which offers a clear legal path towards a vote-Tally-Banning Trumpasmic State and Orange Caliphate via federalism (which grants white power “red states” under APoT control remarkable power to ban and cancel minority and Democrat vote tallies, US Senate malapportionment and power (which grants absurdly outsized power to cancel voting rights and reform measures to the nation’s most reactionary and white states in the preposterously powerful upper body of Congress), the awesome anti-democratic judicial review power of the US Supreme Court (where a 6-3 right-wing super majority stands absurdly far to the starboard side of the US citizenry), the Electoral College (which vastly overrepresents the nation’s most reactionary states and regions), and the 12th Amendment (which calls for the settlement of a contested presidential election marked by conflicting state-level Elector slates by a House of Representatives election “with each state having one vote.”

With the closing of the interrelated territorial, military, economic, and ecological frontiers US capitalism has long been able to use as a safety valve for temporarily escaping from its internal contradictions of race, class, and gender, we’ve reached the Rosa Luxemburg cliff or moment. It’s “socialism or barbarism,” though nowadays and really since the aftermath of the failed German Revolution that led to the murder of Rosa, we need to name the barbarism as fascism and add “barbarism/fascism if we’re lucky” thanks to the even graver if intimately related menace of ecocide. And we nowadays must put the crucial prefix “eco-” in front of “socialism.”

Still, capitalism has never been about actual democracy. It has advanced only oxymoronic bourgeois democracy. “Bourgeois democracy” is not actual democracy qualified by bourgeois power, as in “take money out of politics,” or “we can achieve socialism through reform and electing decent people.” It is the class rule of capital cloaked by nominally democratic and representative electoral and parliamentary institutions and formal rule of law. As Frederick Engels wrote in his introduction to the 1891 edition of Marx’s Civil War in France: “The state is nothing but a machine for the oppression of one class by another, and indeed in the democratic republic no less than in the monarchy.” Lenin put it well in his 1918 pamphlet The Proletarian Revolution and the Renegade Kautsky: “bourgeois democracy…always remains, and under capitalism is bound to remain, restricted, truncated, false and hypocritical, a paradise for the rich and a snare and deception for the exploited, for the poor.” Bourgeois democracy is democracy for the bourgeoisie alone. It is cloak for the de facto class dictatorship of imperial capital.[1]

We will not achieve democracy under the capitalist mode of production. It would take an actual popular and socialist revolution, dedicated among other things to the drafting and implementation of a new constitution (the still reigning American one was drafted by and for slaveowners and merchant capitalists for whom democracy was the ultimate nightmare in the time of Louis XVI), to get on the path of popular sovereignty (the last thing the US Founders ever wanted to see).

If an actual radical Leftist prefers miserable bourgeois politicos like Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Anthony Blinken to malignant white power pandemo-Nazis like Donald Trump, Mike Pompeo, and Stephen Miller in the imperial executive branch, it has nothing to do with believing in bourgeois democracy and everything to do with the calculation that chances for building opposition to the whole damn system are better under bourgeois democracy and its nominal rule of law than they are under fascism. A related calculation tells a serious radical that openly authoritarian rule is the ultimate destination of capitalism, whose rapacious and inherent contradictions always tend towards the final abolition of democratic pretense and constitutional rule of law qualifications and moderations. After concentrated capitalist wealth and the (literally) cancerous spread of capitalist social relations have proletarianized and subjugated most of the species, thoroughly corrupted government and media, badly polluted and cooked the planet, eviscerated key ecological and epidemiological safeguards, it is clear that humanity can no longer survive as long as capital owns and rules the material base and the political superstructure of society. As capital’s identity as the dark class rule lynchpin of humanity’s failed state of being and existential menace becomes more undeniably evident, the bourgeoisie and its political class must undertake to abandon and dismantle democratic pretense and past popular-democratic victories and align themselves with full on revanchist authoritarian and repressive, genocidal ecofascism. Getting neoliberal bourgeois democratic and nominally rule-of-law electoralist politicians like Joe Biden into office and perhaps passing a few half human reform measures become at best holding actions in the face of authoritarian consolidation The holding actions are essential, providing transient breathing room in which to try to organize an “actual revolution, nothing less,” to use the thoroughly appropriate language of the Revolutionary Communist Party, to overthrow a system that devolves towards dictatorship and the destruction of livable ecology by its very historical-material nature.

Endnote

1. You don’t have to be a Marxist or some other kind of anti-capitalist to understand the capitalism and democracy are not only different from each other but opposed to each other. My old copy of Webster’s New Twentieth Century Dictionary defines capitalism as “the economic system in which all or most of the means of production and distribution … are privately owned and operated for profit, originally under fully competitive conditions: it has been generally characterized by a tendency toward concentration of wealth and, [in] its latter phase, by the growth of great corporations, increased government controls, etc.” There’s nothing—nada, zero, zip—about popular self-rule (democracy) in that definition. And there shouldn’t be. “Democracy and capitalism have very different beliefs about the proper distribution of power,” liberal economist Lester Thurow noted in the mid-1990s: “One [democracy] believes in a completely equal distribution of political power, ‘one man, one vote,’ while the other [capitalism] believes that it is the duty of the economically fit to drive the unfit out of business and into extinction. … To put it in its starkest form, capitalism is perfectly compatible with slavery. Democracy is not.” Thurow might have added that capitalism is perfectly compatible with fascism, racism, nativism, sexism, militarism, and imperialism among other authoritarian and anti-democratic forces and formations. More than being merely compatible with slavery, moreover, U.S.-American capitalism arose largely on the basis of the Black cotton slave system in the nation’s pre-Civil War South. This is demonstrated at length in historian Edward Baptist’s prize-winning study The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism. “We must make our choice,” onetime Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis is reputed to have said or written: “We may have democracy in this country, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we cannot have both.” This statement (whoever made it) was perhaps unintentionally anti-capitalist. Consistent with Webster’s(above), the historically astute French economist Thomas Piketty has shown that capitalism has always been inexorably pulled toward the concentration of wealth into ever fewer hands.

Wednesday, August 18, 2021

American Coup D'etat Parts 1 and 2 ~~ Chris Hedges and David Kucinich

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cacJawinmFU

https://www.rt.com/shows/on-contact/531779-dennis-kucinich-on-contact-part-two/

~~ posted for dmorista with introduction written by dmorista ~~

Dennis Kucinich is as good of an elected official as it is possible to put into any position of political power in the U.S. He did manage to protect a city owned electrical generating system from an attempted Corporate Takeover in Cleveland, Ohio, in the late 1970s. He discusses what happened as part of that struggle with Chris Hedges in this two part interview. In the last 5 minutes of Part 2, he and Hedges compare the events around that fight with the events that led to the Coup d'etat against Salvador Allende in Chile in 1973. There were a couple of attempts to kill Kucinich and other threats against him as a result of the attempted power company takeover that he thwarted. The video of Part 2 includes a photo of Kucinich in a bullet proof vest on the mound at Municipal Stadium ready to throw the “ceremonial first pitch” at a Cleveland Indians opening game, that is also in the last 5 minutes of Part 2. His security detail included several sharpshooters posted around the stadium to shoot any assassination operatives who tried to kill Kucinich. The corporate forces also fomented some strikes, including a police strike and a garbage collection strike, against Kucinich and drove Cleveland into a limited default of its finances. They mounted a full-press attack against Kucinich and defeated his re-election campaign. Kucinich then ran for the U.S. House of Representatives and was an 8-term Congressman from the district centered on Cleveland, from 1997 – 2013. The Democratic Party cooperated with the Republicans in Gerrymandering Kucinich's district to eliminate him, an exercise made easier by the loss of one seat in the House as a result of the 2010 Census results. He and Marcy Kaptur (who had represented the Toledo, Ohio area for years) ended up running against each other in the Democratic Party Primary for the House Seat, Kaptur won. Kucinich is once again a candidate for Mayor in Cleveland, Ohio and he is leading in the polls for that race.

Kucinich was not a perfect politician, but he stands out head and shoulders above the typical bribed and intimidated figures who make up the great majority of elected officials. The Left has a habit of severely criticizing and even sneering at even honest and sincere reformist political figures. It is easy to forget that many honest reformist politicians, along with honest grass roots leaders, have been killed by various elements of the U.S. ruling class over recent decades. The forces of darkness can discern a real difference between the sorts of politicians they like to work with and honest reformers they prefer to remove from the scene one way or another. Of course John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy come to mind here, along with senators Paul Wellstone (who was preparing to run for President), Mel Carnahan, and Hale Boggs, owner of George Magazine and son of slain President JFK, John F. Kennedy Jr., and President of the UAW Walter Reuther; all 5 of these people died in questionable “mysterious plane crashes” (the CIA's long time favorite method of eliminating opposition figures). To these we must add Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, and Fred Hampton all variants of grass-roots African-American political leaders, and ones who had moved from solely organizing African-Americans to working with working class and middle class Whites as well. All three of them were gunned down.  Maybe the cover of a private plane crash was not thought to be necessary for MLK; and probably Malcolm X and certainly Fred Hampton did not fly around in private planes.

The next layer down in intensity are the smears and threats of prosecution and imprisonment that are used against reformers. John Edwards, the Senator from North Carolina and Democratic Vice-Presidential candidate in 2004; was an extremely smart working class kid who made a small fortune successfully representing people harmed by corporate malfeasance in the courts. He urged John Kerry to fight against the blatant election fraud in the 2004 Presidential Election. Edwards was successfully smeared for marital infidelity, and removed from the primary campaign to be the Democratic Party's 2008 Presidential candidate. Of course Sarah Palin was carrying on an extra-marital affair with her campaign manager at the same time, but the corporate controlled media didn't utter a peep about it as the extremely right-wing Palin was potentially very useful to the ruling class. Elliot Spitzer, who had worked as New York State Attorney General from 1998 – 2006, became the Governor of New York in 2007. Spitzer understood the financial machinations and swindles of Wall Street better than any other elected public official. He was getting ready to expose the inner workings of the swindles and other excesses of Finance Capital that led to the 2007 – 2008 economic crisis when he was taken down by a “sex scandal” involving high dollar prostitutes. Al Franken was driven from his post as Senator from Minnesota by sexual harrasment charges for which the leading accuser was an operative closely associated with Sean Hannity at Fox News. We have to learn to discern the difference between the honest reformers and the run-of-the-mill bought (or rented) political figures that populate our government. The ruling class can figure out the difference, and they ruthlessly and constantly act on that knowledge.

Standing out from these tawdry events are Dennis Kucinich and Ralph Nader. They are both solid people who could not be set up by “honey pot” sex scandals or financial bribery operations. The corporations and ruling class tried a great number of such operations against Ralph Nader, he was just too honest and upright of a person to fall for the various schemes. Kucinich is in a class with Nader, he cannot be corrupted by the machinations of the ruling class. And he was smart enough to avoid being shot in one of a few assassination plots. Though one time a bullet passed within inches of his head.

I wish to apologize to Leftist Politics readers for the fact that there is only a written transcript for Part 2, and none for Part 1. I learned something in recommending these two parts of the interview for posting, here at Leftist PoliticsRT provides a transcript while the video is still at their website. After they “archive it by posting a YouTube of the video the transcript is no longer available as far as I could determine. So the only way to get access to Part 1 is to watch the video.   ~~dmorista

======================

Part 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cacJawinmFU

======================

Part 2

On the show this week, the second of a two-part interview, Chris Hedges discusses the American coup d’état with former Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich.

Dennis Kucinich served as a US representative from Ohio from 1997 to 2013, losing his seat after the state Democratic Party machine redrew Ohio’s 10th Congressional district, a redistricting designed expressly to oust him, although he is a Democrat, from his seat, which is what happened. He was also the 53rd mayor of Cleveland. As mayor he took on the entrenched power of the big banks and business interests, along with the mob, which controlled City Hall. His anti-corruption campaign included battling back against the efforts to privatize the city’s municipal electric utility, a scheme that would have jacked up utility rates for the city’s residents and netted millions in profits for the banks and the privately owned Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company. His fearless confrontation with these entrenched centers of power, largely hidden in the shadows, swiftly saw these monied interests mount a vicious assault against him, which included a relentless smear campaign, amplified by a press that obsequiously catered to the interests of its big advertisers, and led to a recall vote, forcing the city into default and even assassination attempts. He was defeated in the next election. In December 2020, Kucinich filed paperwork to run in the 2021 Cleveland mayoral election, where he is currently leading in the polls.

Kucinich's new book, The Division of Light and Power, looks back on his tenure as mayor and his confrontation with corporate power that today holds most cities and the country hostage.

YouTube channel: On Contact

Follow us on Facebook: Facebook.com/OnContactRT

Podcast: https://soundcloud.com/rttv/sets/on-contact-1

Chris Hedges: Welcome to On Contact, and part two of our discussion with Dennis Kucinich about the corporate coup d’etat.

CH: In the second part of our interview with Dennis Kucinich, who served as the Representative from Ohio from 1997 to 2013, losing his seat after the State Democratic Party Machine redrew Ohio’s 10th Congressional District.  And he was also the 53rd Mayor of Cleveland.  We look at how corporate power unites to destroy politicians who refuse to do its bidding.  Kucinich is at a corruption campaign which included battling back against the efforts to privatize the city’s municipal electric utility, and going after the outsized influence of organized crime, led to a vicious smear campaign, amplified by a press that obsequiously catered to the interest of its big advertisers, a recall vote, forcing the city into default, and even assassination attempts.  Kucinich in his new book, “The Division of Light and Power,” looks back on his tenure as mayor, and his confrontation with corporate power that today holds most cities and the country hostage.  So Dennis, last week, we talked--we didn’t get into the campaign, of how they went after you--and we will in this segment, and it’s interesting, when I read the book, as a former war correspondent, I would report on atrocities--I mean massacres that have been carried out by military leaders, and it didn’t--it was dangerous.  But as soon as I reported on how they were making money illicitly by--for instance, selling AID food in the market, then my life was in danger.  And that reminded me very much of your experience.  Before we get into what they did to you, the campaign against you, I want to talk about why they had to destroy the public utility because the profits that they can make by privatizing utilities and all public services are immense.  I think you talk about 45% increases, I mean--but explain why they’re going after these public utilities, and how profitable it is for them.

DK: Well, in CEI’s case, Muny Light was providing power to about a third of the city at 20% cheaper than the private utility.  Why?  It’s so simple, you know, Muny Light did not have to pay high salaries, they didn’t have to provide for dividends, and, you know, that whole system of corporate aggrandizement which is supported by ratepayers, you know.  Muny Light wasn’t involved, and it was just simply providing electricity at the lowest possible cost.  So in Muny Light’s case, if you were to privatize Muny Light, then the rates of all the Muny Light customers in this case, you know, eventually, it’s about 46,000 customers, would automatically, you know, rates are low, they automatically go up to CEI’s level.  Then since there’s no yardstick, CEI can keep raising the rates up and up and up.  Now, in Muny Light’s case, Muny Light provided electricity to 76 city facilities and provided the street lighting.  So what does that mean?  That means, you know, the street--the costs were lower, but then all of a sudden, they’re going to start to go up and up, then there’s no yardstick, and they go up for the city facilities, and for street lighting, which means higher taxes.  So the--you know, we calculated, that as a result of my refusal to sell, we stayed probably about a half a billion dollars, all told, including the value of the utility, plus the ratepayer savings, plus the taxpayer savings.  The kind of money that’s involved in privatization is extraordinary, and one must keep in mind, you know, we’re past this prologue, this book is a warning to what’s going to happen when American Rescue Plan Money runs out and cities are pressured then to privatize their municipal services, and that is coming, there’s a wave of that coming, and that’s why “The Division of Light and Power” assumes even greater importance today because it’s a warning about what can happen.  And as Tom Johnson said, you either own them or they’re going to own you.  And there’s a lot of communities that are going to be under threat.

CH: I want to talk about bond markets, because this becomes one of the cudgels they use to destroy you.  Explain.

DK: Well, you know, Cleveland had attorneys who represented them to various bond markets, and to the rating services.  And the rating services, which, you know, everyone knows that--at least at that time, you could basically--you give a rating service enough money, you’re going to get a good rating, that’s just the way it work, it’s, you know, totally pay to play.  And conversely, if a powerful financial interest makes their own unique case, a rating service can downgrade somebody.  So the city will not have access to credit, we’ll have to pay more for it.  So, you know, this is a game that was played against the interest of the city of Cleveland.  And inevitably, what was the paradox of this is that even after the default, people were buying bonds from Muny Light because they knew it was a good investment, but the city had to pay a higher interest rate.  It’s just that, you know, that was out in the open market, but in the book, I also point out how CEI lobbied to make it--to put a provision in the city’s bond offering to Muny Light to make it impossible to sell the bonds on the open market.  So, you know, this is a game that was played using the financial power of Wall Street against the city.  And the other thing is the credit racket.  You know, bond--in order to get a rating today, you have to have a certain amount of money you set aside.  But what cities are doing right now is they’re setting multiples of money aside, and rates are higher than they should be everywhere.  And so Wall Street has enormous influence on cities today.  And the bond market is structured so as to grab as much you can out of cities, and to force cities to basically be a cash cow, and in a way cities end up backing--in some way, considering that we’re talking about the fungibility of money, cities end up backing the casino on Wall Street, that the solid position of the city ends up backing the Wall Street traders.

CH: Well, and if you don’t play the game, in your case, you didn’t even ask for more money, they just wouldn’t roll over your bond.  I mean, that--roll over your debt.

DK: Well, here’s the thing.  We were trying to get not more--you know, not more credit, we’re trying to just get an extension of existing debt on loans that I hadn’t even taken out.  And keep in mind, the city was said to have had a very high credit rating under the previous administration when all these loans were going out, that they really didn’t know if they could be paid back if they were called.  Well, for those viewers who are out there, imagine, you know, you’re making your house payments, and suddenly you’re told you have to pay the entire balance, they called the note.  The city basically had their notes called?  How did that happen?  Because on December 12th, 1978, the largest bank on the State of Ohio told me that if you sell the electric system to the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, which it turns out it was a business partner of the bank, or we, the bank, will not renew the city’s credit on loans that I hadn’t taken out.  So they threaten us with defraud if I didn’t sell Muny Light.  I refuse to sell Muny Light, they put us into default and kept us in default, even though the people of Cleveland passed a tax--the tax themselves to get us out of default, the bank’s committed to being able to--the bank’s committed to removing us from default if the tax passed.  Tax passed, they reneged on their promise, kept us in default until I left office.  This was an example of the weaponizing of credit, and it was, you know, like, being in a banana republic.  They were--they were exercising this power, simply because they could.  And they have no objective reason to.  We had income tax revenue to get us out.  We had property we could sell.  There were so many different areas that we had resources, they wouldn’t take it.  Nothing else was acceptable except the sale of our municipal electric system.  During my term, I operated the city on a cash basis.  We’re the only city in America that was able to do that.  Didn’t borrow a dime, cut city spending 18% without reducing services because of the waste fraud and abuse that existed at city hall.  So, you know, it doesn’t--you could play [INDISTINCT] it doesn’t matter.  These financial concerns will try to strangle a city if you don’t march to their tune.  Well, I didn’t march to their tune, but we still have public power today.

CH: Let’s talk about the school system, because this has real consequences for the children of Cleveland and for children in cities across the United States.

DK: Well, in Cleveland at that time, the city would grant tax abatements and the money would also come from the schools.  And schools, check this out, the schools were on the verge of an insolvency, at the same time, the city council is giving away tax abatements.  And then the banks were threatening the schools while the banks are getting money that should be going to the schools.  This is horrific.  In addition to that, state law was changed in Ohio to tax commercial properties at the same rate as residential, and it’s called the park investment case.  A park investment case enabled commercial and industrial interests to have lower taxes, and residential had to pay more.  So that’s one of the reasons why when school [INDISTINCT] would come forward, they’d be voted down because the property tax burden on homeowners was exceptional.  And so, you know, this whole system has been set up against the interest of the average Clevelander.

CH: Great.  When we come back, we’ll continue our conversation about the corporate assault on public assets and our democracy with Dennis Kucinich.  Welcome back to On Contact, we continue our conversation about the corporate assault on public assets and ultimately, our democracy with Dennis Kucinich.  So just in the last part of this show, Dennis, I want to talk about what they did to you.  We’re--and we’re talking about very serious assassination attempts, firing a high-powered rifle fired into your home, someone throws a Molotov cocktail towards your home, the police and the FBI uncover a plot to assassinate you while you’re in kind of a local parade.  And you’re saved only because you have a bleeding ulcer and have to go to the hospital.  I mean, this--they don’t play games.  When they realize they could not buy you off than they did an--and we’re talking about the mob, certainly, because you went after the gambling and the--all the kind of vices, you have a great line that city fathers hypocritically went on crusades against some types of crime while enabling vice to profit which you didn’t allow to happen.  So, you had the banks, destroying the fiscal solvency.  You had a recall campaign, they orchestrated an election to try and recall you and then it failed.  I mean, it just talked about when they realized they couldn’t buy you off what they did?

DK: Well, you know, I led a campaign as I went from City Council where I discovered what’s going on to Clerk of Courts, which is the second highest elected office.  And when I was clerk, that’s when the city made a move to sell the municipal electric system, even though they knew all of the corruption and--that was being committed against it.  So, they tried to sell it at a cut rate.  I intervened with the campaign.  The minute I started that campaign, high-powered rifle shot, misses my head by a fraction.  And then I found out--I mean, that was before I became mayor.  I was elected mayor on a promise to save the municipal electric system.  And it wasn’t too long into that that I was apprised of the fact that there was a plot against me.  Now, I never said anything about that publicly, Chris during that time.  It was only years afterwards it came out.  A US Senate subcommittee investigation on organized crime in the Midwest determined that there was this mob plot and what was going on, the chief investigator for the city, the head of the intelligence Lieutenant Karasik.  And I write about this in the book.  I asked him, I said, “Why is this happening?”  And he said, “Well, you know, I’m not in politics.  But let me tell you something.  This is about Muny Light.  You’re stopping a lot of people from making some money or you’re stopping people from making a lot of money.  And, you know, so my--our job is to protect you.  I can’t give you political advice.”  So, you know, this.  Yeah, it was about Muny Light, no question about it.  And, yeah, they, you know, these people play for keeps, and it was only through, in my estimation, act of God that I was still alive, because had I been in that parade in October of 1978, according, you know, to the Senate report, you know, there would have been an attempt made and keep in mind, Cleveland, during that period, was considered the bombing capital of America.  The mob was very active, there were competing interests, there was a war going on for control the rackets.  And, you know, we were under pressure at city hall to look the other way.  I wouldn’t do that.  So, you know, this could--we weren’t talking about being back here.  This is a serious business that was going on.  And--so but what the first time the connection is made between a corporate objective and an assassination attempt.

CH: They’re quite successful because the media serves as their echo chamber.  You go out to throw out the first ball and your--you have to wear a bulletproof vest.  Upon the mention of my name, tens of thousands of fans rose as one producing a hearty standing boo.  It rocketed around the stadium, a homerun cheer in reverse.  What did you feel inside at that moment?

DK: I just wanted to throw a strike.  You know, that’s all--I mean really, it’s, like, as I white in the book, focus, focus.  This was a dream for me when I was elected.  I--I’m a kid from the neighborhood of the city.  I’m gonna get to throw out the first pitch at a Cleveland-Indians baseball game.  So, you know, and I mean, and I had the general manager of the Indians, Gabe Paul.  He used to be the head of the Yankees.  He came to me and he said, “You know, I don’t think you should do this.  Not a good idea.”  And I’m thinking, “Well, you know, if you get every time American [00:05:05] political trouble you can throw out the first pitch, you just you know, what do you do?”  Anyhow, I--yeah, walked to the mound--I walked to the mound with a bulletproof vest on.  And I was looking up at the rim of the stadium.  There weren’t--there weren’t pennants there, there were sentinels with sharpshooters, just, you know, readying their aim to protect me.  You know, that was kind of surreal.  But as I’ll let the reader determine how that pitch came out.

CH: So, at the--they’re determined to remove you from office.  The police go on strike, there’s a garbage strike.  The city’s in default.  They control the press.  What’s the difference between what they did to you?  And in a more extreme form, what they did to Allende and Chile.

DK: Oh, well, look.  Yeah, I have people call Allende’s plight to my attention while it was going on.  People were involved in the documentary about it.  You know, he did not get out alive.  You know, I will tell you that.  No question it was a coup attempt in Cleveland.  You know, when you think about destabilizing a government, you know, don’t pay, you know, create police strikes, create garbage strikes.  And all of this was aimed to try and to force me to sell the electric system, there’s just no question about it.  And each time was like a new test.  You know, are you going to sell?  Are you going to sell?  Are you going to sell?  And, no, I--you know, there’s a point in life where you have to figure out who you are and what you stand for.  And if you’re, you know, there--it’s easy to stand for someone [00:07:09] when there’s no consequences.  I knew full well what the consequences would be.  I knew I was looking into an abyss, that my political career was going to be over.  I had no idea I’d ever be able to have another one again.  And you have to remember, I was only 31 years old when I took office as mayor.  I was a youngest mayor in the country.  And, you know, like, there was another 31-year-old officeholder at the time, who was governor of Arkansas.  You know, the point is that not many young people get into positions of power like that, and I was fully aware of what the opportunities were.  But in order to advance, I was basically told the price of my advancement was selling out to people elected me.  And I also thought about--

CH: I was pushed out of the New York Times for denouncing the call to invade Iraq.  It ended my career in mainstream journalism and you say, looking into the abyss, but really, what you were looking into was salvation, wasn’t it?

DK: Well, yeah, I mean, the--as I--when I spoke on a night of default in city council, I used the story of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego and how King Nebuchadnezzar said they had to worship an idol of gold.  And they refused to do it.  And he threw them into the furnace, but they came out whole.  You know, I was not going to worship this idol of gold that have been constructed in the form of an electric system of bank, the city’s establishment you know, I believe there is such a thing as a soul.  And I--to me, when it--the way I grew up, what profit a person if they gain the whole world but lose their soul, I believe that so I can’t be bought, can’t be bossed.  To me, you know, there are some things that are worth fighting for.  And that’s what I did.  And the city has its electric system today.

CH: Towards the end of the book, you quote, Weir, I don’t have his first name.  But he writes…

DK: Brock Weir.

CH: Yeah.  And he says, “This is a war.  They are on one side, you are on the other.”  We’re not talking about recovering $5,000,000.  We’re talking about recovering a city.  When he says we, you have to understand that Cleveland trust not only owns a big share of CEI, they own substantial portions of nearly every major business and Cleveland, corporate Cleveland finance the recall, Cleveland Trust is corporate Cleveland.  It is a war.  And it’s a war we’re losing.  And it’s not just in Cleveland.  Although you did manage heroically to save the public utility just in the last two minutes and you mentioned it earlier with--now, the results of the pandemic and this push by corporations to privatize everything.  Talk about the war we’re facing.

DK: We have to work to maintain democratic governance.  I mean, democracy is an idea, the expression of it and the activation of it is up to those who are elected.  What happens is that when corporations own a public official, the corporations will see government working in our interest.  I point out in the--at the beginning of the book government works.  Question is who is it working for?  And with Citizens United and other impairments of campaign financing, there’s more and more influence that corporations have.  So, what happens?  It’s up to the individuals to take a stand again, you know, and challenge the system.  And I think there will be change coming.  I do think there are more enlightened people who are going into court, you know, into various businesses, who understand that, “Hey, they better pay attention to their own businesses and not think they can run the government at the same time.”  I mean, let’s face it.  Some of these corporate leaders who got involved in Cleveland, their businesses eventually went like this because they lost sight of what they were supposed to be doing.  Now, you know, I’m--I feel that there can be in this room, certainly for working together with business.  But if public officials do not function in the interest of the general public as opposed to function in the interest of major contributors or big corporation, if you can’t do that, you’re going to lose you’re--not just your community, we’ll lose our democracy.  And, you know, there were kind of there have been some ways already.  How do we retrieve it?  Informed citizenry, don’t be afraid to take a stand if you’re running for office.  And if you’re in office, remember who put you there, if it was for the people.

CH: Great.  That was Dennis Kucinich on his new book, the division of light and power.